Now, “normal growth” can be inferred based on those raw score/percentile pairings…with the caveat that when students are performing below grade-level expectations (e.g., well below the 50th percentile), we likely don’t want normal/average growth, but rather higher growth rates so that they begin catching up with their peers over some amount of reasonable time. In other words, we likely want a student performing at 10th percentile to score higher than average growth on a given measure, so that over time that higher rate of growth relative to peers jumps them off and above the 10th percentile “track” (closer to the 50th percentile).
So, one thing teachers can do is — once a student’s current level of performance is known and whether or not they will receive additional instruction/intervention and be progress-monitored — to look at those tables I cite above and perhaps the student’s individual graph to determine reasonable goal(s) for the student. Reasonable, based on where they are performing now, the resources (e.g., time/interventions) available to you and the student, and reasonable with respect to the norming group.
I give a specific example of how this might work below:
After benchmarking, you might compare the benchmark percentile rank with the student’s progress-monitoring rank and then decide when you want a student who had a raw score of 118 words correct/minute (wcpm) on the fall Passage Reading Fluency benchmark (118th percentile rank) to attain the 50th percentile score by the spring (for this hypothetical student, the 50th percentile has been determined to be reasonable given the amount of time and resources we have). Relatively speaking you will need to count the number of weeks the students are in school (from a calendar) and related the Fall, Winter, and Spring benchmark scores closest to when students they took their initial test. General benchmark dates for easyCBM are as follows: Fall – Sept 15th, Winter – Jan 15th, and Spring – May 15th.
So, this 6th grade student who took the Passage Reading Fluency benchmark on October 30th and received a score of 100. By looking at the Progress Monitoring Scoring Guidelines/individual graph, and comparing their score to other 6th graders at that time of year, this student would ideally have had a raw score of 141 (50th percentile score at fall benchmark for Grade 6). Thus, the winter goal for this student would be 158 wcpm. and the spring goal would be 166 wcpm. In other words the student will have to score 40 wcpm higher by Jan. 15th, and then 48 wcpm higher by May 15th in order to reach a goal of performing at the 50th percentile based on associated raw scores by the end of the school year.
For planning a strategy of improvement for your student, you will need to consider when you want them to reach their goal. If by taking their benchmark test on October 30th you want your student to reach their winter benchmark goal of 158 wcpm (by Jan. 15th), you have 8 weeks for them to improve 40 wpm, or about 5 wcpm per week. Looking over the longer-term, you are looking for a spring benchmark goal of 166 wcpm (by May 15th), in which you have 23 weeks to see a 48 wcpm improvement, or about 2 wcpm per week growth in raw score over the school year.
We have also recently added a Goal Setting feature that can be found on the Reports page > Individuals tab. We also offer a couple of short tutorial videos related to both the science of progress-monitoring and goal setting within the specific context of easyCBM (accessible from that same page and from the following links: https://youtu.be/